Add interoperability into the equation, and then it becomes easier to track and improve global statistics and health trends and clinical research around issues of global concern.”
ICD 10 VS 11 CODE
“So, at that point, we're all using the same code system globally.
It's just specific to the United States, and ICD-10 is like that as well,” Brewton says. “Historically, the US has always taken the code set, and we've made our own clinical modification that no one else uses. In addition, many industry experts believe that the implementation would not require a separate US modification, which was a necessary undertaking for previous ICD implementations. Sandy Brewton, RHIT, CCS, CICA, CHCA, CPC, an AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer and senior health care consultant with Panacea, says that the specificity of ICD-11 meets the expectations that she had of ICD-10, offering new opportunities for impacting patient care and outcomes. The expectation is that new classification in ICD-11 will allow providers to build the codes that will accurately describe the conditions they are treating for billing purposes, even if they still select an "unspecified” code, Gatehouse explains, emphasizing that the fact that it will be EHR compatible is even more important, making its implementation easier and, most likely, less time consuming and labor intensive than ICD-10. ICD-11 allows countries to count and identify their most pressing health issues by using a current and clinically relevant classification system,” she says.įor the first time, ICD will be entirely electronic and easy to install. “This 11th revision is the result of a unique collaboration with clinicians, statisticians, and classification and IT experts from around the world. One of the key differentiators of ICD-11, according to Gatehouse, is that it is the first ICD revision designed for use in today's electronic environment. “It is better for the industry to be prepared and not anticipate major delays as we have historically experienced.”
ICD 10 VS 11 PROFESSIONAL
“Individuals should keep abreast of any updates and join ICD-11 committees and discussions within their professional associations to initiate networking and brainstorming,” she notes. “It is anticipated that the transition period from the implementation period will last between two and three years to the final implementation of ICD-11,” Gatehouse says.Īnd while that places US implementation in the mid to late 2020s, Susan McGrogan, president of Coding Services Group, suggests that now is a great time to start thinking about and understanding the possible impacts to the industry. A report from the National Center for Health Statistics states it will take at least five years to implement ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics for mortality reporting in the United States, and the implementation for ICD-11 for morbidity might take even longer. The earliest any country can begin using the new code set is January 1, 2022, although Gatehouse notes that there is speculation that it may take longer in the United States because of the way the health care system captures mortality and morbidity. “However, recalling the tedious process of implementing ICD-10 is excellent motivation to prompt the industry into seriously thinking about and planning for ICD-11 sooner rather than later.” “It would be a fair assessment to say that there are still those in the industry that haven't fully recovered from the ICD-10 transition, especially in the realm of coder training, so understandably the idea of ICD-11 has some feeling a bit uneasy,” she says. In truth, the mere thought of a new ICD implementation is enough to send HIM professionals running for the hills, according Susan Gatehouse, CEO of Axea Solutions. Now the big question is, “What does that mean for the US health care system?”
On the ICD-11 front, two significant milestones occurred last year: The World Health Organization (WHO) officially released the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the World Health Assembly formally adopted ICD-11. Is it time for health care organizations to start thinking about it?
0 kommentar(er)
